Based improvised explosive raised in the markets, finally, which called itself "revolutionary", saying on one, feel free to wider these days, and go to the imminent danger that afflicts Egypt, now, is the awakening of the Mubarak regime and preparedness to pounce.
The movement of these "movements" pleasant topic of serious and radical conflict with the military coup Foundation, a daughter of legitimacy to the Mubarak regime and his country, to struggle with the Mubarak men who prey on the country. If extended line on the integrity, you can clearly realize that the target of movements, such as "the beginning", is the address for the return of state Mubarak, in order to protect Abdel Fattah al-Sisi system and, therefore, not such as victimization, or treason, it is said that these movements emerged Mantle of the current system devices.
It remains the promotion contradiction artificial between the State of Mubarak and state-Sisi kind of tricks the film, for the manufacture of delusional threat to the revolution of January, comes from the old system, and then to everyone queuing to confront it, and direct sense, here, is the defense of Sisi system, to expel the Mubarak regime.
In order to access to this equation, Mulls owners "the beginning", and those who stand behind them, to show the seriousness of the hordes of state Mubarak parked on the doors, to mark the attack and the invasion and control of Egypt again, so that the speech of the movement is a letter "Aonaoa" to the core, This is based on a combination of corrupt January revolution and a coup in June, who dressed as a counter-revolution.
Rather, the object of "the beginning" no qualms about disclosure explicitly expressed concern on the current system (Abdel Fattah al-Sisi system), From the onslaught of the old system which take media forms, and political, such as the fierce attack which runs from the newspapers and channels owned by businessmen campaigns are still maintaining their loyalty and belonging to the Mubarak regime, as well as Gamal Mubarak and Ahmed Ezz timid movements on the political scene.
In a nutshell, they want to mobilize people to address the State of Mubarak, is not love and Tdelha in January revolution, as much as a desire to protect the honor of the thirtieth of June represented by Abdel Fattah al-Sisi. Thus, without all their statements of one word express their position on the current power, or determine their perception of what happened since the third of July 2013, and whether it was a coup or a picnic in the open gardens?
Whether it is true that Mubarak time symbols are waiting for the current to power, or that things are taking place in the agreed-upon context, and feed on the nonwoven scenarios produced by workshops State deep in which he is to join her, equally, Sisi and his men, and Gamal Mubarak and his men, the outcome, here, that the whole conflict It does not take into account the January revolution, both Anesbha Alachminat and hostility, and wishes that wiped out all the implications of the presence, today before tomorrow.
I said in this place, at the time the play's presidential election, and attempts to blow into Hamdeen and enlarged rival for Sisi, the battle between the heir to Mubarak in uniform "Sisi" and heir paternity blood and the name "Gamal Mubarak", while Hamdeen does not exist in the first place, but a piece of decor to complete political form.
Very briefly, we can say that "the beginning", and recognition of their spokespersons, one of the manifestations of the thirtieth of June, which cling Palmzawjh between them and the twenty-fifth of January, though I checked the letter issued by Abdel Fattah al-Sisi, since seized power, find the man presents itself as a protector of what he calls the fraudulent "revolutions", Library, continues to speak as a "cream elements" that lineage extends into January, "Revolution" and June "counter-revolution", even checked the contents of the speech "the beginning", you find depends themselves bilateral, declaring that his battle is with men Mubarak time.
In doing so, this movement is not much different from other movements originated in the days of Mubarak's rule, an expression of the struggle between the old guard "Awagiz the state," and the new thought (Gamal Mubarak and collections Youth), A conflict that begins and ends within the same project boundary, and one approach, leading the struggle of "the Mubarak regime.".
Mubarak is Sisi, Gamal Mubarak is, there is no Tkhaddankm attempts to lift the "sandal-Sisi" promoting dangerous "Mubarak phosphate".