Anniversary of the tragedy of Karbala coincided this year with the anniversary of the completion of three months on the fourth massacre in the heart of Cairo. There are similarities between these two Alvajotain improves retrospect, and there are similarities between the political circumstances in which each of the incidents occurred.
This similarity suggests that the legitimate political knot is still controlling in the thought and reality of Muslims since the massacre of Karbala to a fourth massacre.
Is no Karbala massacre that is still commemorated soft, and a fourth massacre that their blood is still fresh, only an expression of political legitimacy in the Islamic civilization crisis, a crisis rooted in a moral dilemma chronic is the conflict between the executioners and martyrs, among people of conscience is not the consciences of them.. In every time and place.
Every civilization crisis, and the crisis of Islamic civilization constitutional crisis in essence, due to the conflict between the concept of political legitimacy based on justice and voluntary consent, and the concept of power Almtgelbh based on algebra and oppression.
“Karbala is not a massacre that her memory is still fresh, and a fourth massacre that their blood is still fresh, only an expression of political legitimacy in the Islamic civilization crisis, a crisis rooted in a moral dilemma is a chronic conflict between the executioners and martyrs”
This crisis has begun the night of the shed, and beat them the first generation of Muslims, about a quarter of a century, but a resounding exploded at the end of the succession Othman and Ali over the succession, and it becomes impossible to fierce civil war between Iraq and the camp led by Ali al-Sham and the camp led by Sid.
Battle was the night in the town of Herar “Two rows” Summit to express those tragic civil war.
And not the revolutions of the first century, but an extension of the war two rows, and in order to overcome the constitutional crisis.
One of these revolutions of Imam Hussein bin Ali, who Hab revolution “Outrage to religion and standing right” (Ibn al-Arabi, capitals p. 237). And it ended tragically Karbala revolution, and the revolution against the people of the city increases, has “They God” (Golden: Sir Heraldry 4/37) And ended their revolt over pay themselves the Army of the city of Medina, and the revolution Abdullah ibn al-Zubayr in Mecca, and the revolution led by those who repent companion Suleiman bin Sard, and the revolution of scholars led by Abdul Rahman bin Shaggy. Then the subsequent revolutions sparked by the Kharijites and others throughout the life of the Umayyad dynasty.
Islamic political jurisprudence Menzaan has fought since the end of the era of caliphate. Almenza first is the view of Imam Hassan bin Ali, God bless them. This is the view conciliatory likely unity of the nation and the legitimacy of power.
Almenza this was the beginning of a constituent school of thought espoused by most of the political and Shia Imami before the modern era, and they expressed the idea of the pious, as espoused by the majority of the Sunnis, and they expressed the idea of politeness.
Vcefqh year group, which concluded with Muawiya Hassan year 41 Immigration constituent occurred in the Sunni political thought and Imami alike.
The second Almenza: It is the view of Imam Hussein bin Ali, God bless them. A stripper revolutionary dismissive of the legitimacy of King Aledod, or come to terms with the political injustice.
While Hassan has prevailed -ovi political jurisprudence Sunni and Imami- Fear of sedition and intimidation of them, the al-Hussein was seen political tyranny and injustice is the same sedition.
Hussein was cross about it in a letter in which he said to Sid: “I think me and what God Jhadk Sorry to leave, I do not know the greatest affliction is your state of this nation.” (Ibn'Asakir: The history of the city of Damascus 14/206).
This approach is the one who Anthjtah Ismaili Shia in the Middle Ages, then the Shia Imami Anthjtah during the past three decades, were scholars in Iran against the Shah, and Shiite uprisings revolt against the rule of the Baathist tyranny in Iraq, and the Shiite resistance to the occupation in southern Lebanon.. An expression of this Almenza Husseini.
But Shiites after they have achieved political themselves in Iran, Iraq and Lebanon during the past decades, and took control of the Levant where they are a small minority, they began today tend conservative turn, resistant to movements of the People's Revolutionary change, even the back of what looks like the exchange of roles between what was a doctrine Hasinia adopted by Shiites in the past decades, and the doctrine was adopted Hassanaa year until recently.
We find with the Arab Spring Majid that the bulk of the Sunni peoples tend Hasinia revolutionary trend today, Almighty Shiite peoples tendency to conciliatory Hassanaa. And I wish Shiite political elites were limited today on the doctrine of al-Hassani Saket political injustice without the approval of his or attribution, but unfortunately exceeded that much, fell in a moral paradox scandalous, they raise the flag today in the Levant Hussein and Yazid's army in fighting!!
Thus Imam Hussein glorious revolution in Shiite memory turned today to Tbarih emotional, and ritual dense no pulse nor life, irritation public elites them and throw them in the midst of sectarian war is absurd, and exploited by Iran in behind the illusions of power and arrogance of power to Htha, a meaner countries with the blood of its people, and Ajodha the blood of Arabs.
And not the least deviation from this is what happened to the memory of Karbala Salafist revolution in memory, some Salafists built justifications for Flat sluggish over the heinous crimes that Wendy and her brow history, even some of them were busy with people -ochgl- Ptdbej books in the investigation where it is located today the head of Hussein, may Allah be pleased with him, Is it in Karbala, or Medina, or Ashkelon, or Cairo.. Laying waste moral lesson from this founding event in Islamic history.
And not a matter of the martyr Hussein, who exalted above ground considerations, and gave up his soul for the sake of truth and justice, where settles primarily head-Sharif, and to build up his body Tahir golden domes or Zvi Alsoava him in the desert.
In this rubble we find consolation in the study of the deep tragedy of Karbala for Shiite Studies -baida Altbarih and justifications Salafist- It is a book Mahmoud Abbas El Akkad “Abu martyrs Hussein bin Ali”.. Akkad dealt with the logic of moral tragedy of Karbala sober, and deep analysis myself, and focused on the great moral significance of this tragedy.
We content ourselves here with three of the similarities between the tragedy of Karbala -as provided by the Registry of Akkad- A fourth and a tragedy that we have lived three months ago, to see some of what was done to both Alvajotain of moral significance and historical meaning.
The first similarities between Karbala and a fourth is the nature of the conflict in the two cases. Where Akkad believes that Karbala was one of the greatest scenes of conflict in human history between the two ideas, or M'zajin the expression is, two generosity mood and the mood of expediency.
Lost “The whole battle was the generosity and utilitarian battle” (Akkad: Abu martyrs Hussein bin Ali, p. 29) And”Life Hussein may Allah be pleased with him was a page, not matched by page, to distinguish between these two Alm'zajin” (s 12).
Akkad and stresses the need for clarity in this regard, because the conflict between Hussein and increases in Karbala was a struggle between “Attitude of generosity in the face of blatant attitude of blatant benefit, has reached the position of both the far end and beyond Gaite. Vantsr Hussein Bocharf what in the human soul of jealousy on the right and distaste for the hypocrisy and politeness, and triumphed over Borzl what in the human soul of greed and mirrors and subservience to small pleasures and passions” (s 9).
And demonstrates insightful considering that the conflict between supporters of the revolution and the legitimacy and between supporters of tyranny and counter-revolution in Egypt today does not come out from this equation, the equation of the conflict between utilitarian and decadent instincts and impulses between the nobility and stones.
Wrabah Karbala is our time, with the right to stop the brilliant abstract of each power but the power of faith and principle, in the face of blatant falsehood warrior intensive physical force and bloody oppression and steal money and shameful collusion.
If it is true to note that Akkad “No man has won where it should not disappoint as bin Muawiya won over to Hussein in his war, and was sued by two men, one really explained and demonstrated as well as from King Hussein before him in to Yazid” (s 23), There is no winner in our time won where it should not disappoint like bloody coup in _khashumichm with the legitimate authority in Egypt's leaders, nor was a man in our time really explained Morsi in before him with the putschists.
The second face of the similarities between Karbala and a fourth is the presence of some political mistakes in the party who is right, as opposed to the existence of enormous sins in rescinds party.
But haggle between nobility and villainy that ruled the starting position and make the end of the talk about the political and military mistakes appreciation is a secondary, but make it the most desirable of error is right right rescinds.
Akkad was expressed by eloquence the family, he noted that some of the political and military the right thing in the camp over “Right it can do many easy” (s 11) And from the pure blood shed, and the consciences of those who do not buy the consciences of them, and to prevent children and women thirsty of access to water.
He also noted that some political and military error that appeared in the camp of Al-Hussein “Hard error which can not do, but few” (s 11). And from the face of an army of four thousand fighters a few tens of fighters, and stick to the right and justice check with death in their release.
If you see errors busy day for the sins of the oppressor oppressed in Egypt, ignorant and does not know that he understands what he says, or greedy sold his conscience cheaply, or a coward gloss behind philosophizing and the length of the tongue.
The third side of the similarities between Karbala and a fourth is to note the difference between Akkad Sid generation of builders of the Umayyad dynasty, and more than a generation of torturers who do not have ambitions menial -ora- Any political project worthy of the description.
Akkad has been written about it says: “كان لمعاوية مُشيرون من ذوي الرأي، كعمرو بن العاص، والمغيرة بن شعبة، وزياد بن أبيه، وأضرابِهم من أولئك الدُّهاة الذين يُسمِّيهم التاريخُ أنصارَ دولٍ وبُناةَ عروشٍ، وكان لهم من سمعة معاوية شعارٌ يُدارون به المطامع، ويتحللون من التأثيم.
لكن هؤلاء بادُوا جميعا في حياة معاوية، ولم يبق ليزيد مشيرٌ واحدٌ ممن نسمِّيهم بأنصار وبُناة العروش، وإنما بقيتْ له شرذمة على غِراره، أصدقُ ما توصف به أنها شرذمة جلاَّدين، يقتُلون من أُمِروا بقتله ويقبضون الأجر فَرِحين.
Sid was the agents of politicians and people with advice, and it was more than agents of the executioners.. Those who are filled with hatred chests on the sons of Adam, especially those who were on both the creation and good Alohdoth, if unload their hatred in his hostility.. These are all evil son of a Jawshan fennel, and Muslim bin obstacle, and Obeid-Allah ibn Ziyad, and appends Bzmrthm an example close to their example Omar bin Saad bin Abi Waqas” (s 44-45).
والذي يقارن السيسي مع سلفه من حكام مصر العسكريين خلال العقود الستة الماضية سيجد فرقا بين جيليْن يشبه الفرق بين الجيلين الذي شرَّحه العقاد.
We've managed since Asaker 1952 From the assassination of Egyptian democratic development, and to impose the logic of tyranny and corruption that has bedeviled this great state and remove it from the history, building “Republic of officers in Egypt” Which describe the researcher Sayegh over in his study entitled this title the depth of corruption and Atralha, but none of them did not show him to lean in the efficiency of the leadership and the logic of a state, as demonstrated by Sisi.
Abdel-Nasser, the alter ego and recklessness, and Sadat attachment to pagan America, and Mubarak on his country sense and corruption, did not reach any of them the level of moral nadir of political and stupid to make it kills thousands of Egyptians civilians in cold blood, in one day, and in the heart of Cairo, and under the nose of the world.
But the coup leader Gatman on the chest of Egypt today to do so, because it is acting in the logic of the executioner who is not a political project, as far as carrying a grudge on each and every noble spirit of the tendency to freedom and human dignity in Egypt.
They are aware of the moral Jdbam coup, and they both seem to abhor him a principled stand in favor of right, justice and freedom.
They found in a fourth field and Renaissance men and women of the sons and daughters of Egypt believe in the right of their people to freedom, justice and human dignity, and they are ready to expending their lives, souls, sacrifice and Pflmat livers in order to achieve this noble message.
So it was with the executioners deep hatred, oppression and terrible in their hands, expresses the souls sadistic criminal, and with a shaky lost confidence in themselves.
When facing the executioners of free peoples, there is no logic to politics and the jurisprudence of the state, it does not know Valjlad political thinking and political budgets.
That fact was not lost on the observer smart Mahmoud Abbas Akkad pen, wrote: “Since more than that spent on these and their ilk have his aides in his property, spent from her watch to be treated to the issue of the treatment of Hussein executioners who do not know is bloodshed… And so it was over to the agents if one of them stood alone in its aid is given away executioner sword and a whip for the sake of money, and it was the agents of Hussein if someone stood alone in making its aid is a martyr for the sake of the whole world Spirit. They permission war executioners and martyrs” (s 48).
In light of the three similarities between Karbala and a fourth, it would be impossible to predict the fate of the bloody coup of power in Egypt.
We catch up with the perpetrators of the massacre of Karbala told us about history: It perished more than three years after the massacre, and perished captain Muslim bin obstacle Astbaanh Medina after three days, “Six years and did not pounce on the death penalty until Hussein catch every man injured in Karbala, scarcely had delivered one of them from killing and torturing, with a bad reputation and obsessive conscience” (s 71).
And it has been the curse of Karbala pursuing the Umayyad dynasty even has guided its corners, “The death of Hussein is a killer disease that dwelt in her body until he spent it” (s 71) Umayyads neighborhoods, killing, and burning dead.
If the deadline last executioners sometimes enjoy the fruits of Agramhm a few years, the depth of people's awareness of their rights today, and the acceleration of the movement of history in our time, not executioners much Amhlan.
Do not ask about the fate of the power shift led to a handful of ruthless executioners Livers.
It really torturers and war martyrs, as described by El Akkad, started in Karbala, it did not end in a fourth.. It will not be the end but the end of tyranny and barbarism which Tsas our nation today.
the source : Al Jazeera Net