I did not think in my life that the United States can be a partner for any country at the moment of democratic transformation or a moment of a popular revolution against suppression system ''s political, economic and social rights.
The lack of positive pink- While he was in the ministry during the last four months of 2012- The request of the US ambassador in Cairo to visit me in my office, and then not to respond to one of her aides same desire stems from this mental state that each reader has the right to describe in any capacity he wants, including the negative traits.
Whatever they made of mental effort and historical will not be able to provide one model of the state of liberation which helped the United States or the case was welcomed by the democratic transformation, abandoning representatives of dictatorship. On the contrary, the United States since World War dark side chose in international politics to play the role of the dominant and supporting each dictatorship forms party, which turned a blind eye to the excesses of the governments of blood from Vietnam to Cambodia and the Arab region to the Americas, Latin and South, as well as Almhadh Africa that suffer all forms of dictatorship, poverty and disease, despite all its wealth and its potential.
Indeed, the wealth and potential of some countries is what constitutes the elements of attraction for US policy in support of the dictatorship and against the aspiration of peoples to freedom; where US policy is based on a simple axioms: Drop the concept of the state for the convicted political entity dictatorial regime, and then move on to design a strong relationship between the American state and the system dictatorship, so as to achieve the interests of the United States as a state and the regime's dictatorial Kaasabh suppression, regardless of whether it leads to that of the waste of national interests of the state of the victim.
It can, in the context of this for granted, to understand the statements of all the United States and ministers during Mubarak's rule until the last Kerry's statement at the opening of the strategic dialogue in Cairo earlier this month on the achievement of common interests between the two countries, US policy has shortened the country of the victim in tyranny system does not invoke much aspirations peoples; hence, the common interests are not intended to achieve the interests of the people, but in control of the power and wealth Group.
Under these same Muslim women can be explained by the positions of the United States during the January revolution which were not more than an attempt to deal with the development of non-sudden for her public statements satisfy the rebels, while seeking in fact in cooperation with the Staff of the State of Mubarak to restore the same system in the same policies and that a new blood. Perhaps that is why this is what has led with other factors to stop the strategic dialogue with the Mubarak regime in 2009 With the feeling that the United States system eroded its legitimacy and become unable to perform the duties of the partnership and then must change and faced with no compromising the essence and role of the service.
The United States did not reflect never pleased with developments suffered by the Mubarak step down, but in multiple positions expressed its concern to the point reached for a statement that Egypt no longer girlfriend at the height of election 2012 Presidential; then never condemn the drop in civilian president 3 July 2013 But it expressed displeasure about how to deal with the protest that followed, and tried to intervene with the opposition parties of the coup to reach a settlement essence was only the acceptance of the return of the Mubarak regime new people with the left margin to move the opposition domesticated and abandon the demands of democratization and ignoring the old new power behavior that is wasted each human and civil rights.
We are in front of a superpower because it- According to its own- Since assuming the leadership of the international system does not recognize much the aspirations of the peoples, but the extent of authoritarian regimes ability to provide services related to several issues do not change in the American agenda since sixty-five years, and repeated in a speech Kerry latter on his re-strategic dialogue with the old new regime in Egypt under the title attempt to restore the role Egyptian fast.
It comes in priority to these issues, regional security, which means identification with the policies of the United States and to provide security and military allow them itself or through the security capabilities of the countries in the region to maintain dysfunctional balance between regional powers make always the Arab side in the most vulnerable and in need of protection posture facilities, and is strange that they make use powers Arab to achieve it.
The second issue, ensure that the direction of the economic situation to further subordination of the Western economic system dominated by the United States; which explains Kerry estimate for the coup government in an effort to reduce energy subsidies (Consumer and not industrial) And begin to remove what he calls the obstacles to foreign investment, which means ending the remainder of the controls to the work of the multinational companies which already controls the bulk of the Egyptian economy since the last two decades of the Mubarak era.
As well as the American Minister to confirm the necessity of activating Egypt to function within the framework of the QIZ agreement, which was ashamed of the Egyptian pro-coup newspapers referred to, simply because it defines the scope of Egypt's trade integration with the economies of the region so that the orbiting qualified Israeli economy- From the American point of view- To lead the regional economic system identified with American interests.
The third issue that envied her many without the knowledge of its effects, is the emphasis on cooperation in innovations and patent protection, and that does not mean support for scientific research in Egypt, but rather to emphasize and put it on the sidelines of the international innovation system which deprives them from acquiring any capacity to innovate and make them a customer is guaranteed to Western technology and patents of inventions of American medicine to transportation to communications technology. The system of international innovations, which includes the patent system ensures the United States absolute dominance of ownership for more than 90% Assets of innovations in the world, whether patents or other technology or knowledge and then constantly seeking to recruit the energies of the states to protect this wealth.
We are in front of a pack of American politicians can not any upright political system and rational to be carried out, and then the United States is aware that the regulations illegitimate and based on the security of repression and starved for recognition and embrace Western them are alone that can accept to do this service role humiliating.
As if the words of a man the CIA Miles Copeland in the seventies of the last century hesitate in starting the strategic dialogue throughout the hall in Cairo early August 2015: “We were eager to Arab ruler combines hands power superiority to facilitate any Arab ruler another by, the governor could make decisions alienated them peoples and Tobaha; and we had to seek SEARCH IS OVER in a thirsty man to take power, do not pay it only love is absolute and a passion for unique out”..
the source : Huffington Post Arabic